News
Blackout is now live in Reveal
Back to blog
Articles

eDiscovery in the Brave New Digital World

Cat Casey
July 21, 2025

9 min read

Check how Reveal can help your business.

Schedule demo

Check how Logikull can help your business.

Schedule demo

Tech evolution isn’t creeping forward. It’s tearing through the fabric of how we live, work, and play. Over 150,000 new mobile apps are launched every month. TikTok hit a billion users in under half the time it took Facebook, and entire new ecosystems of digital communication are forming before most legal teams can figure out how to log in. This isn’t a wave. It’s a flood. And it’s bringing a whole new breed of electronically stored information (ESI) into the discovery crosshairs.

Whether it’s short-form video platforms, self-destructing messages, or the chat threads your client swears they “never used for anything formal,” these new data sources aren’t just noise. They’re discoverable. They’re evidence. And they’re forcing the legal world to reckon with a reality it’s been trying to sidestep for way too long.

 

A computer set up on a tableAI-generated content may be incorrect.

New Data Delicacies

The Legal industry is no stranger to emerging types of electronic data, it seems like just a hot minute ago that the Federal rule of civil procedure had to pivot to encompass ESI within discovery requests, spawning eDiscovery in the first place. But the sheer volume of new data sources facing legal teams today is staggering. Legal technology is helping to bridge the gap, but the practice of law is truly in some uncharted territory.  

Many of the new kids on the ESI block were squarely in the personal use domain, but the pandemic and mass shift to a virtualized workforce accelerated adoption of many new applications in a business context. In the last few years there was a mass adoption of ephemeral messaging apps like WhatsApp to facilitate communications in global teams.  

Video conferencing platforms that once operated in the fringes, like Zoom, Skype and Teams saw daily active user numbers explode into the hundreds of millions as everyone from corporate professionals to students from elementary to grad school turned to this technology to stay connected in socially distanced times. And both information technology groups, and legal professionals found themselves struggling to keep up with this dramatic and shockingly rapid shift.  

What is the Savvy Legal Professional to Do?  

You don’t need to be a digital forensics guru or a Silicon Valley whisperer to navigate this shift. But you do need to stop pretending that Slack, TikTok, and ephemeral messages don’t matter just because they didn’t show up in your 2016 discovery playbook. If it generates digital exhaust, it’s fair game in discovery. Period.

Instead of fear-spiraling over new data types or playing compliance whack-a-mole with your IT team, start by acknowledging that these platforms exist and that they’re already being used in a business context. If your preservation protocols still assume Outlook is the main character, you’re not just behind—you’re creating risk.

This isn’t about boiling the ocean or chasing every shiny app. It’s about building muscle memory into your legal team to ask the right questions upfront. What collaboration tools does this custodian use? Are there channels or shared drives involved? Is there a chance that emoji-laced text exchange on Signal holds key intent evidence? That quick Slack chat might be your smoking gun.

Asking those questions early can be the difference between pulling the right data in week one and discovering a sanctions-worthy gap in week twelve. You don’t need to become a digital anthropologist. But you do need to be curious, proactive, and willing to embrace workflows that weren’t cooked up during the Blackberry era.

A blue and purple ice cream cone with a couple of balls of ice creamAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Flavors in the Brave New World of ESI

The volume, velocity, and variety of data flying across modern systems would make a first-gen email review tool spontaneously combust. But in the chaos, there’s structure. Legal professionals need to know what buckets to look in, what challenges to expect, and what tech to line up before things get messy.

Here’s what’s bubbling up most in the new Dataverse.

A person sitting at a computerAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Legacy Social Media

Platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn and Instagram still boast user bases in the billions (nearly 4 Billion to be exact) with hundreds of millions of interactions that could contain potentially relevant data for a matter. To avoid spoliation, it is important to understand early in a matter if these legacy platforms will be relevant and tot take steps to defensibly identify and preserve the data at the outset of a matter. Data collection from social media platforms is a tricky beast, especially given the wealth of personal data and metadata that often resides within accounts, posts and the platform.  

While eDiscovery workflows for social media have been around for quite a while, the increased global focus on protection of Personally identifiable information (due to GDPR and other global privacy regulations) makes collection and document review of ESI from these platforms especially complex. Service Providers and counsel alike must ensure the utmost in steps are taken to ensure data protection to avoid sanctions for mishandling the PII rich data source. The Right eDiscovery software can make a critical difference with legacy tech and emerging alike.  

TikTok: When gummy bears singing Adele rule online - BBC News

New Social Media

Younger users have gravitated away from more established social media platforms in favor of short format and video content rick platforms like Snapchat, Vines and most recently TikTok. These platforms were are often written off as simply something that a tween might use to make a heartfelt video using gummy bears for Adele (yes that’s a real thing) ... but judging from the billions of dollars that major retailers and financial institutions are investing, that would be a bit short sighted. TikTok in particular is projected to hit over $12 Billion in ad sales in 2022, more than twitter and Snapchat combined... and double again by 2024.  

Big money means big potential for litigation, and to date there have already been murder cases, IP matters and complex litigation involving TikTok ESI. understanding how to Identify, search, preserve and ultimately conduct an effective document review on this new video heavy social media platform will only increase in the coming years. Legal practitioners and service providers alike ought to ensure their partners equip them with the computer vision and Artificial Intelligence enabled tech necessary to effectively review it.  

A person looking at a computer screenAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Video Conferencing Tools

Since the covid spurned mass virtualizations of the workforce and world, everyone from elementary students to outside counsel to presidential candidates have migrated to mass adoption of a variety of video conferencing tools like Zoom, Teams, Google, and the old standby Skype. Many lawyers have also found themselves in a virtual courtroom via one of these applications over the last 3 years, some even manifested in this virtual interface as my furry namesake while pleading with the bench that they were no, in fact, “a cat.”

These platforms contain a wealth of ESI from the videos themselves, the transcripts, chat function and material shared on the videos themselves. To Effectively identify, and review this mountain of video and transcript data, AI powered tools with Computer vision powered image and classification and search functionality can be immensely helpful. But the first step is to Include this content in scope and ensure that appropriate steps are taken to preserve and implement defensible data collection.

Collaboration Tools

As with Video conferencing tools, collaboration tools like Slack, Teams, Google Drive and more also saw a massive surge in users and adoption because of the massive work from home revolutions the pandemic spawned. Slack and Teams are a much different animal that more traditional email-based communication because the much of the communication does not “fit” within the four corners of document.  

The short format communication that epitomizes collaboration tools, is shared within channels where users can pop in and out over any period. There is not a clear beginning or end, or other constraint to a slack channel conversation and users can freely share, video, emojis, gifs, documents housed in external document management. stems and more. As a result, uncovering, preserving, and reviewing ESI from these tools is not as intuitive as a more traditional email review. Understanding IF you have this form of data can greatly impact which service providers, legal technology, and eDiscovery workflow a case team uses.  

A phone with a bombAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Ephemeral Messaging

For those of us old enough to recall Get smart, or perhaps who caught the reruns on “Nick at Night”, self-destructing messaging seems like something straight out of an episode of the show. But the reality is that there are a wide variety of platforms that have bakes in exactly this self-destructing functionality in digital communication platforms. Even as recently as this week, the more traditional communication platform iMessage from apple added the ability to edit or delete text messages in a way like what platforms like WhatsApp, Snapchat, and Signal offer.

These platforms offer confidentiality, but can also expose an organization to unforeseen liability as was the case with the use of ephemeral messaging App Wicker by Uber in the Uber v Waymo case. The former received an adverse inference in an IP case because of using the ephemeral application. Understanding of these types of platforms are in scope at the outset of an investigation or litigation can be key to recovering data or mitigating risk of sanctions for spoliation.  

Text Messaging

While cell phone data and even SMS messaging is far from a new source of ESI, a dramatic increase in the use of text messaging for business communication has increased the potential relevance of SMS data in eDiscovery. The short format communication is now rife with GIFs, Emojis, video and more, causing new levels of complexity in preserving, collecting, and reviewing the data.  

Mobile devices and text message threads today can have more data to cull through than old school hard drives, LegalTech can facilitate analyzing this data, but the right tech and visualization is necessary to not break the bank in doing so. And simply playing ostrich with this data source may exclude highly relevant ESI. People are often more informal and candid in text, and that is exactly where some of the juiciest communication and ESI may reside.  

A cartoon of a bird with red laser beams coming out of its eyesAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Internet of Things  

Smart stuff has exploded in adoption and variety in the last few years. Today there are more IoT connected devices than there are humans on the planet, and that is set to more than double by 2030. The Internet of Things is an ecosystem of physical objects with sensors, processing ability, software, that connect and exchange data with other devices and systems over the Internet. From smart cars to wearable health trackers, smart homes to smart cities, there are devices collecting, sharing, and generating a wealth of discoverable data all around us and this ESI is already being used widely in the judicial system.  

An Alexa and a hot tub were the smoking gun in a murder case while a wearable health tracker has been used to both convict and exonerate people, I even dealt with a client once who had uncovered drug use in their c-suite via company provided health trackers... and the list goes on. Increasingly it is important to ensure that you have these smart things included as potentially relevant sources of ESI to investigate.  

Metaverse/ Web 3/ Augmented Reality

One new strange kid on the block is the decentralized digital augmented reality known as the Metaverse. today multiple private companies own and host their own Metaverses that human can access via an avatar using a PC or a VR device.  

A myriad of questions around the scope and scale of ESI resident in the Metaverse, whether and how it is preservable and collectable ad who owns the data are already arising. And, from IP to assault the litigation around the Metaverse is already starting to heat up. I would imagine that most cases will not involve the Metaverse ESI for a while, but that could quickly change as more people and business adopt the brave new virtual world.  

We’ve officially crossed the Rubicon. The volume, velocity, and weirdness of modern data is accelerating by the hour. Pretending otherwise won’t save you from sanctions or spoliation. From smartwatches to Slack threads, metaverse avatars to AI-generated contracts, evidence is multiplying and mutating in real time.

This moment calls for more than muscle memory. It demands curiosity, adaptability, and a tech stack that can keep up. The legal teams that thrive now are the ones who stop clinging to "business as usual" and start engineering workflows for the reality of today’s Dataverse.

That means rethinking information governance. Rethinking who you partner with. Rethinking tools. If your stack still revolves around emails and PDFs, you’re not just behind — you're invisible in the places evidence lives.

The good news? You don’t need to boil the ocean overnight. Start by asking better questions. Build policies that acknowledge — not ignore — the weird stuff. Work with people who have navigated these data types in the wild. Embrace the AI and analytics that surface signal from noise.

You can’t stuff the genie back in the bottle. But with the right mindset and the right stack, this brave new digital world isn’t a liability. It’s your edge.

Grab your helmet. The ride’s just getting started.

A robot using a computerAI-generated content may be incorrect.

AI-Generated Content

Let’s talk about the synthetic elephant in the virtual room. AI-generated content is exploding. From Gen Z TikTokers spinning up AI narrators to enterprise marketing teams churning out blogs, pitch decks, and product descriptions at scale, we are knee-deep in a content deluge that no human could reasonably produce — because, well, they didn’t.

This isn’t just ChatGPT blurbs and Midjourney art. It’s email drafts, contract redlines, demand letters, support chats, even code. And increasingly, this AI-authored content is becoming part of the evidentiary record. The twist? Most of it is generated with zero audit trail, unclear authorship, and no standardized metadata.

How do you authenticate a document when the "author" was a large language model fine-tuned on internet soup? How do you verify that a contract clause wasn't hallucinated by some overeager prompt engineer? How do you scope discovery when the custodian is more chatbot than human?

These aren’t theoretical questions. They are already hitting the courts. Judges are sanctioning attorneys for submitting AI-generated filings with fake citations. Companies are issuing internal policies on generative use. And the eDiscovery community is just starting to grapple with how to track, preserve, and validate content that was never typed by a person in the first place.

Discovery professionals will need to understand how and when AI is used, whether content was created by humans, co-authored with machines, or entirely synthetic. That means building workflows that can detect fingerprints of AI generation, flag hallucinations, and navigate questions of privilege, authorship, and intent in brand-new ways.

Just like with Slack and ephemeral messaging before it, the first step is to stop pretending AI-generated content doesn’t count. Because it does. And in some matters, it may be the most relevant evidence of all.

Navigating the Brave New World

We’ve officially crossed the Rubicon. The volume, velocity, and weirdness of modern data is accelerating by the hour. Pretending otherwise won’t save you from sanctions or spoliation. From smartwatches to Slack threads, metaverse avatars to AI-generated contracts, evidence is multiplying and mutating in real time.

This moment calls for more than muscle memory. It demands curiosity, adaptability, and a tech stack that can keep up. The legal teams that thrive now are the ones who stop clinging to "business as usual" and start engineering workflows for the reality of today’s Dataverse.

That means rethinking information governance. Rethinking who you partner with. Rethinking tools. If your stack still revolves around emails and PDFs, you’re not just behind, you're invisible in the places evidence lives.

The good news? You don’t need to boil the ocean overnight. Start by asking better questions. Build policies that acknowledge (not ignore) the weird stuff. Work with people who have navigated these data types in the wild. Embrace the AI and analytics that surface signal from noise.

You can’t stuff the genie back in the bottle. But with the right mindset and the right stack, this brave new digital world isn’t a liability. It’s your edge.

Grab your helmet. The ride’s just getting started.

Get exclusive AI & eDiscovery
insights in your inbox

I confirm that I have read Reveal’s Privacy Policy and agree with it.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.