Products
Use cases
Industries
Resources
Company

Your leadership wants AI in the discovery workflow, and they want it this year. Your security team wants to know exactly where sensitive matter data goes and which models get to touch it. Both positions are reasonable, and the market keeps insisting you can satisfy only one: take the cutting-edge AI that lives in the public cloud, or keep control of your data in a private environment, but do not expect both. In the 2026 eDiscovery Buyers Report a survey of 200 senior eDiscovery decision-makers, they rejected that notion of mutual exclusivity. And they are right, data control and AI model access can coexist.
AI innovation moves fast in legal tech, and when you choose an eDiscovery platform, you also choose the role AI will play in your process. That makes your eDiscovery platform choice a long-term decision, not a feature checkbox. The platform you pick today shapes how easily you can adopt the frontier models that arrive tomorrow, where those models are allowed to run, and whether you or your vendor decides which ones you use. Buyers who take the long view look past the demo and ask a harder question: as AI keeps changing, will this platform keep pace, and will it keep the choice in my hands?
The demand for AI was universal among the participants in the eDiscovery Buyers Report. 100% of buyers call the ability to run their own proprietary or fine-tuned AI models important to their operations. Not "nice to have." Important. And 99% say access to modern AI on privately deployed software matters to them, which tells you they expect strong AI wherever the platform runs, not only in the public cloud.
This is not early-stage curiosity. 60% of buyers describe their AI adoption as Active or Aggressive, meaning they are running pilots, rolling out targeted use cases, or putting AI at the center of their 2026 plans.
Beyond that, when you consider the range of factors that go into a deployment decision, from cybersecurity to cost predictability, AI emerges as the single largest driver of deployment decisions, both at face value and through the influence it holds over factors like cost, security, and infrastructure control.
Its clear buyers want AI, but that doesn’t mean they are willing to give up the private deployment model in exchange. They are pushing back against vendors that have put them in that corner and call out the motive. 68% believe their primary vendor is steering them toward a deployment model that suits the vendor’s commercial interests more than their own.
Add it up, and the message is consistent. Buyers want strong AI and control over their data and models, and they have stopped believing they must surrender one to get the other.
The teams getting this right treat AI access and deployment as two dials they set independently. You can do the same.
Among the 200 buyers surveyed, a distinct group sidesteps the cloud-versus-private debate entirely. They refuse to let a vendor choose for them. Rather than consolidating onto one deployment model, they buy for movement between models and treat the ability to change course as a requirement, not a convenience. They want to move a matter into the environment it belongs in, and swap in a better AI model as the field evolves, without rebuilding their platform each time. That posture is what "future-proofing" looks like when the pace of AI change is the one thing you can count on.
An AI model is the large language model or analytics engine your team runs inside its eDiscovery environment. A deployment model is where the platform runs and who controls the infrastructure, whether public cloud, private cloud, or on-premises. They are separate decisions, and a good platform lets you make them independently.
No. The idea that advanced AI lives only in the public cloud is out of date. 99% of buyers say access to modern AI on privately deployed software is important, and platforms like Reveal Private Deployment are built for this reality and run the same AI privately that they run in the cloud.
That is exactly what buyers are asking for. 100% call the ability to run their own proprietary or fine-tuned models important. Look for a platform that supports running the best model for a given job on infrastructure you control, rather than restricting you to one vendor-chosen model.
Because needs change and models improve. 68% of buyers call portability important or a deal-breaker, and 30% treat it as a deal-breaker outright. Portability lets you move a matter to the right environment and adopt a better AI model without retooling your entire platform.
Buyers have stopped treating strong AI and control of their data as an either-or, and the smartest deployment strategies now keep both on the same side. Reveal Private Deployment ensures buyers don’t have to compromise on either of these priorities.
Read the full eDiscovery Buyers Report to learn how buyers in 2026 make deployment decisions.